{"id":10809,"date":"2020-02-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-02-04T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/prodim2020.wpengine.com\/resource\/net-promoter-system-from-metric-to-meaning\/"},"modified":"2022-10-12T23:43:09","modified_gmt":"2022-10-12T23:43:09","slug":"net-promoter-system-from-metric-to-meaning","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/inmoment.com\/de-de\/resource\/net-promoter-system-from-metric-to-meaning\/","title":{"rendered":"Net Promoter System: From Metric to Meaning"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Author: Eric Smuda, Principal, CX Strategy & Enablement, Pearl-Plaza<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The Net Promoter Score\u00ae (NPS) has defined organizational improvement for years. Introduced by Fred Reichheld in 2003, the metric was lauded for its speed, flexibility, and its ability to distill multiple departments and improvement efforts down to a single number. Though the Net Promoter Score has long been a staple of internal improvement efforts, multiple companies are challenging the metric\u2019s relevance in the modern experience landscape. Some firms are even asserting that NPS is \u201cdead.\u201d The reasons for this are many\u2014some organizations feel that other scores are more ideal for quantifying change. Others charge that the system is simply too susceptible to abuse by dishonest employees.The Game-Changer<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Though the Net Promoter Score has garnered widespread acclaim since its debut, it is but a piece of a far larger puzzle: the Net Promoter System\u00ae. Unlike the Net Promoter Score, which focuses on producing a quick numerical summary of an organization\u2019s well-being, the Net Promoter System finds the meaning behind that number and spurs action at both the individual customer and whole audience levels.
Indeed, by Fred Reichheld\u2019s own admission, the Net Promoter Score ultimately doesn\u2019t matter\u2014what truly matters are the trends, shifts, and changes<\/a> that the Net Promoter System can help organizations identify. What follows is a primer on understanding both the Net Promoter Score and Net Promoter System in this way, and thus unleashing their true potential.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe State of NPS<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
In NPS\u2019s defense, however, these problems can occur no matter which metric organizations use. This type of fraud tends to rear its head anytime a score is tied to employees\u2019 compensation and, frankly, is more an indictment of a company\u2019s culture than the score itself. Because of this, organizations should carefully consider the ramifications of tethering any metric to compensation.
Many firms are also wary of the Net Promoter Score for a different reason\u2014they may not know how best to implement the metric in their organization. It\u2019s not unheard of for companies to accidentally misuse NPS by, say, employing a relational Net Promoter Score to evaluate transactions. Company culture and a history of previous score use also play massive roles in how well (or not) an organization can adapt NPS.<\/p>\n\n\n\nIs NPS Dead?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n