{"id":42415,"date":"2022-03-24T06:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-03-24T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inmoment.com\/resource\/employee-commitment-employee-experience\/"},"modified":"2022-03-29T01:03:51","modified_gmt":"2022-03-29T01:03:51","slug":"employee-commitment-employee-experience","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/inmoment.com\/en-sg\/resource\/employee-commitment-employee-experience\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Employee Commitment, Not Just Engagement, Is Today’s More Progressive Approach To Improving Employee Experience"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Author: Michael Lowenstein, Ph.D, CMC, CCXP, Senior Director, Employee Experience Consulting, Pearl-Plaza<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The concept of employee engagement has been the default approach to employee experience (EX) for close to 40 years, and its strengths and challenges have become especially pertinent in this age of The Great Resignation. Many brands, especially those that had insufficiently invested in employee support and contribution during the pandemic, are now scrambling to develop policies and programs aimed squarely at addressing employee needs<\/a> so that they don\u2019t fall victim to the unprecedented churn transforming the job landscape.<\/p>\n\n\n\n These policies and programs, and the drive to update them, are conventionally seen as the apex of employee experience creation. The reality, however, is that there is another, much more contemporary and action-centered EX concept that every enterprise should embrace as its focus for achieving Experience Improvement (XI) for its employees. That concept is employee commitment<\/a>, and it\u2019s a paradigm shift in how organizations have to address employee needs and wants. Here, I’ll describe not only how significantly employee commitment differs from engagement, but also why it’s essential for your organization to embrace a commitment mindset if your objective is to create meaningful human connection and role contribution with employees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As introduced above, employee engagement is principally a set of policy-focused processes. The brands and EX teams dedicated to developing and executing employee engagement see their responsibilities as building programs that a) listen to employees, b) gather feedback, and c) distill actionable insights and develop initiatives from all that data. The overarching goal of engagement, then, is simply to meet foundational employee job needs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Other factors that set engagement apart from employee commitment include hard and soft costs. Many organizations measure engagement solely in monetary terms. The hard numbers are certainly important, and there is some evidence (though inconsistent) that engagement measures impact business outcomes. That said, reducing employees to a set of numbers is one of engagement’s key drawbacks, and engagement has largely failed to stem the flow and rate of employee churn. It also falls short of what companies can attain (culturally and<\/em> operationally) with employee commitment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Whereas employee engagement’s boundaries are derived by its focus on numbers and its more reactive conceptual philosophy, employee commitment is more holistic and progressive. Rather than dealing with employee performance improvement as policy modification, commitment is about driving supportive enterprise culture through transparency, trust, and communication. It recognizes the need for employees to have an emotional connection to the organization and its purpose, not just general job satisfaction. Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, commitment encourages organizations to demonstrate how (and how effectively) all employees, not just those who are customer-facing, impact customers\u2019 behavior and help forge meaningful relationships wherever customer and company intersect.<\/p>\n\n\n\nDefining Employee Engagement<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Defining Employee Commitment<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n